Atheist Principles


The late Christopher Hitchens had an admirable knack for ferreting out the differences between those who follow a religion and those who, like me, don’t. Unhappily, he had a tendency to ramble. Sorting through his prolix rant God is Not Great, I have managed to distill his atheist principles into a fairly coherent list that works for me, even if it does contain some redundancies.  Read Chapter One of GING for Hitchens’ original peripatetic treatment.

  • Our principles are not a faith.
  • We do not rely solely upon science and reason, but we distrust anything that contradicts science or outrages reason.
  • We do not hold our convictions dogmatically.
  • We may differ on many things, but what we respect is free inquiry, open mindedness, and the pursuit of ideas for their own sake.
  • We are not immune to the lure of wonder and mystery and awe.
  • We have music and art and literature and find that the serious ethical dilemmas are better handled by Shakespeare and Tolstoy and Schiller and Dostoyevsky and George Eliot than in the mythical morality tales of the holy books.
  • We do not believe in heaven or hell, yet no statistic will ever find that without these blandishments and threats we commit more crimes of greed or violence than the faithful.
  • We are reconciled to living only once.
  • We believe with certainty that an ethical life can be lived without religion.
  • We do not need any machinery of reinforcement. We do not require priests to police our doctrine.
  • We have no need to gather to proclaim our rectitude or to grovel and wallow in our unworthiness.
  • Sacrifices and ceremonies are abhorrent to us.
  • To us no spot on earth is or could be “holier” than another.
  • We know that religion has caused innumerable people to award themselves permission to behave in ways that would make an ethnic cleanser raise an eyebrow. To the ostentatious absurdity of the pilgrimage or the plain horror of killing civilians in the name of some sacred wall or cave or rock, we counterpose a leisurely walk from one side of the library or gallery to another or to lunch with an agreeable friend.
Advertisements

About aharmlessdrudge

Way back during the late Bronze age -- actually it was the 1950s -- all of us in high school had to take a vocational test to determine our interests and, supposedly, our future careers. I cannot remember the outcome, but I do recall one question that gave me pause. "If you were to win a Nobel prize, would it be in literature or in physics?" I hesitated over the question: although I enjoyed mathematics and science more than English class, I did have a couple of unfinished (and very bad) novels hidden away at home. I cannot remember what I chose back then, but the dilemma followed me to university, where I switched from mathematics to English and -- after a five-year stint in journalism -- back to mathematics. I recently retired as a professor of statistics. Retirement. What a good chance to revive my literary ambitions. I have finished a novel -- more about that in good time -- and a rubble of drafts of articles about mathematics and statistics is taking up space on my hard disk.
This entry was posted in Atheism and Religion and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s